Το κινητό σου σύντομα δεν θα σου ανήκει πια.

67 μέρες μέχρι το lockdown

Από το 2027*, μια αθόρυβη αναβάθμιση, που θα εγκαταστήσει η Google χωρίς συναίνεση, θα μπλοκάρει κάθε εφαρμογή Android της οποίας ο προγραμματιστής δεν έχει εγγραφεί στην Google, δεν έχει υπογράψει το συμβόλαιο της, δεν έχει πληρώσει και δεν έχει παραδώσει κρατικό έγγραφο ταυτοπροσωπίας.

Κάθε εφαρμογή και κάθε συσκευή, παγκοσμίως, χωρίς δυνατότητα άρνησης.

↓

Τι κάνει η Google

Τον Αύγουστο του 2025, η Google ανακοίνωσε μία νέα προϋπόθεση: από το 2027, κάθε προγραμματιστής εφαρμογών Android θα πρέπει να εγγραφεί κεντρικά στη Google προτού το λογισμικό του μπορέσει να εγκατασταθεί σε οποιαδήποτε συσκευή. Όχι μόνο εφαρμογές του Play Store: Όλες οι εφαρμογές. Αυτό περιλαμβάνει εφαρμογές που μοιράζονται φίλοι μεταξύ τους, εφαρμογές που διανέμονται μέσω του F-Droid, εφαρμογές φτιαγμένες από ερασιτέχνες για προσωπική χρήση. Ανεξάρτητοι προγραμματιστές, θρησκευτικές και κοινωνικές ομάδες, καθώς και ερασιτέχνες, θα στερηθούν τη δυνατότητα να αναπτύσσουν και να διανέμουν το λογισμικό τους.

Η εγγραφή προϋποθέτει:

Αν ένας προγραμματιστής δεν συμμορφωθεί, οι εφαρμογές του μπλοκάρονται αθόρυβα σε όλες τις συσκευές Android παγκοσμίως.

Ποιοί βλάπτονται

Εσύ

Αγόρασες ένα τηλέφωνο Android επειδή η Google σου είπε ότι ήταν ανοιχτό. Μπορούσες να εγκαταστήσεις ό,τι ήθελες, και αυτή ήταν η συμφωνία

Η Google τώρα αλλάζει αυτή τη συμφωνία, αναδρομικά, σε συσκευές που ήδη σου ανήκουν. Μετά την ενημέρωση, θα μπορείς να τρέξεις μόνο λογισμικό που η Google έχει προεγκρίνει. Στο τηλέφωνο σου: Την ιδιοκτησία σου, για την οποία εσύ πλήρωσες.

Ανεξάρτητοι προγραμματιστές

Η πρώτη εφαρμογή ενός εφήβου, το εργαλείο ιδιωτικότητας που έγραψε ένας εθελοντής, ή η εμπιστευτική εσωτερική έκδοση beta μιας εταιρείας. Δεν έχει σημασία ποιο. Το 2027, κανένα από αυτά δε θα μπορεί να εγκατασταθεί χωρίς την «ευλογία» της Google.

Το F-Droid, πηγή για χιλιάδες δωρεάν εφαρμογές Android ανοιχτού κώδικα, έχει αποκαλέσει αυτό το γεγονός ως «υπαρξιακή» απειλή. Ο Cory Doctorow το αποκαλεί "Darth Android".

Κυβερνήσεις και η Κοινωνία των Πολιτών

Η Google έχει αποδεδειγμένο ιστορικό συμμόρφωσης όταν αυταρχικά καθεστώτα απαιτούν την κατάργηση εφαρμογών. Με αυτό το πρόγραμμα, το λογισμικό που υποστηρίζει τις κρατικές υπηρεσίες της χώρας σου θα εξαρτάται από τη βούληση μιας και μόνο ξένης εταιρείας που δεν λογοδοτεί σε κανέναν.

Το EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation) χαρακτηρίζει τον έλεγχο πρόσβασης στις εφαρμογές ως «έναν συνεχώς διευρυνόμενο δρόμο προς τη λογοκρισία στο διαδίκτυο».

Η «έξοδος διαφυγής» που προσφέρει η Google είναι μία παγίδα.

Η Google αναφέρει ότι «προχωρημένοι χρήστες» μπορούν «ακόμα να εγκαταστήσουν» μη επαληθευμένες εφαρμογές. Δείτε πώς θα γίνεται αυτό στην πραγματικότητα:

  1. Άνοιξε τις Ρυθμίσεις, βρες τις «Επιλογές προγραμματιστή»
  2. Πάτα πάνω στον «Αριθμό Κατασκευής» επτά φορές για να ενεργοποιήσεις τη Λειτουργία Προγραμματιστή
  3. Αγνόησε τις κινδυνολόγες προειδοποιήσεις περί εξαναγκασμού
  4. Πληκτρολόγησε το PIN σου
  5. Κάνε επανεκκίνηση της συσκευής
  6. Περίμενε 24 ώρες
  7. Επίστρεψε, αγνόησε ακόμα περισσότερα μηνύματα με κινδυνολογία
  8. Επίλεξε «Να επιτρέπεται προσωρινά» (7 ημέρες) ή «Να επιτρέπεται πάντα»
  9. Επιβεβαίωσε, για μία ακόμη φορα, ότι κατανοείς «τους κινδύνους»

Εννέα βήματα. Μία υποχρεωτική περίοδος αναμονής 24 ωρών. Για να εγκαταστήσεις λογισμικό σε μία συσκευή που σου ανήκει

Ακόμη χειρότερα: Αυτή η διαδικασία τρέχει αποκλειστικά μέσω των Υπηρεσιών Google Play, όχι μέσω του λειτουργικού συστήματος Android. Η Google μπορεί να την αλλάξει, να την περιορίσει, ή να την αφαιρέσει ανά πάσα στιγμή, χωρίς να χρειαστεί κάποια ενημέρωση λογισμικού ή έγκριση από τον χρήστη.

Αυτό είναι μεγαλύτερο από το Android

Αν η Google μπορεί να «κλειδώσει» αναδρομικά δισεκατομμύρια συσκευές που πουλήθηκαν ως ανοιχτές πλατφόρμες, κάθε παραγωγός hardware στον πλανήτη παρακολουθεί.

Η αρχή που καθιερώνεται είναι η εξής: η εταιρεία που κατασκεύασε τη συσκευή σου έχει το δικαίωμα να αποφασίζει, αφού την αγοράσεις, ποιο λογισμικό επιτρέπεται να χρησιμοποιείς. Στον κόσμο του λογισμικού, αυτό ονομάζεται «rug pull» - αλλά τουλάχιστον σε αυτή την περίπτωση μπορούσες πάντα να εγκαταστήσεις ανταγωνιστικό λογισμικό. Στον κόσμο του hardware, πρόκειται για ένα τετελεσμένο γεγονός που σου στερεί κάθε δυνατότητα επιλογής και σε καθιστά ανίσχυρο απέναντι στις ιδιοτροπίες ενός και μοναδικού, μη υπόλογου «φρουρού» και νομικά διαπιστωμένου μονοπωλητή.

Η «ανοιχτή φύση» του Android δεν ήταν ποτέ απλώς ένα χαρακτηριστικό του. Ήταν η υπόσχεση που το καθιστούσε διαφορετικό από το iPhone. Εκατομμύρια χρήστες επέλεξαν το Android ακριβώς για αυτόν τον λόγο. Η Google τώρα ανακαλεί μονομερώς αυτή την υπόσχεση, σε συσκευές που βρίσκονται ήδη στην κατοχή των χρηστών, επειδή αποφάσισε ότι έχει αρκετή κυριαρχία στην αγορά και επιρροή στους ρυθμιστικούς φορείς ώστε να τη γλιτώσει.

Ars Technica: «Ο φθόνος της Google για την Apple απειλεί να καταστρέψει την παράδοση της ανοιχτής πλατφόρμας του Android.»

Μισό λεπτό, μήπως αυτό...

«...έχει να κάνει απλώς με την ασφάλεια;»

Το επιχείρημα της ασφάλειας είναι παραπλανητικό. Το Google Play Protect ήδη ελέγχει για κακόβουλο λογισμικό ανεξάρτητα από την ταυτότητα του προγραμματιστή. Η απαίτηση κρατικής ταυτότητας δεν κάνει τον κώδικα πιο ασφαλή. Κάνει τους προγραμματιστές αναγνωρίσιμους και ελεγχόμενους. Οι δημιουργοί κακόβουλου λογισμικού μπορούν να εγγραφούν. Οι ανεξάρτητοι προγραμματιστές και οι διαφωνούντες συχνά δεν μπορούν. Το EFF είναι κατηγορηματικό: Ο έλεγχος πρόσβασης βάσει ταυτότητας είναι ένα εργαλείο λογοκρισίας, όχι ασφάλειας.

«...συνεχίζει να επιτρέπει το sideloading εάν χρησιμοποιήσεις την προχωρημένη μέθοδο;»

Εννέα βήματα, αναμονή 24 ωρών, κρυμμένα στις Επιλογές Προγραμματιστή, παρεχόμενα μέσω μίας ιδιόκτητης υπηρεσίας που η Google μπορεί να ανακαλέσει όποτε θέλει. Αυτό δεν είναι «sideloading». Είναι ένας μηχανισμός αποτροπής που έχει σχεδιαστεί για να διασφαλίζει ότι σχεδόν κανείς δεν θα τον ολοκληρώσει. Και δεδομένου ότι λειτουργεί μέσω των Play Services και όχι μέσω του λειτουργικού συστήματος, η Google μπορεί να τον περιορίσει ή να τον καταργήσει αθόρυβα.

«...αποτελεί πρόβλημα μόνο αν έχεις να κρύψεις κάτι;»

Οι πληροφοριοδότες, οι δημοσιογράφοι και οι ακτιβιστές που ζουν υπό αυταρχικά καθεστώτα θα είναι τα πρώτα θύματα. Ακολουθούν τα άτομα που βιώνουν ενδοοικογενειακή βία. Όλες αυτές οι ομάδες έχουν βάσιμους λόγους να διανέμουν ή να χρησιμοποιούν λογισμικό χωρίς να καταχωρίζουν τα πραγματικά τους στοιχεία σε μια βάση δεδομένων της Google. Η ανώνυμη συνεισφορά στον ανοιχτό κώδικα είναι μια παράδοση παλαιότερη από την ίδια τη Google. Αυτή η πολιτική, τερματίζει αυτή την παράδοση στο Android.

«...είναι το ίδιο πράγμα που κάνει και η Apple;»

Η Apple ήταν εξαρχής ένα «κλειστό» οικοσύστημα. Ο κόσμος επέλεξε το Android επειδή ήταν διαφορετικό. Η δικαιολογία του «και η Apple το κάνει» αποτελεί ισοπέδωση προς τα κάτω και ένα αδύναμο λογικό επιχείρημα τύπου tu quoque. Και υπό την πίεση των ρυθμιστικών αρχών (ο Νόμος για τις Ψηφιακές Αγορές της ΕΕ), ακόμη και η Apple αναγκάζεται να ανοίξει το οικοσύστημά της. Η Google κινείται προς την αντίθετη κατεύθυνση: προσπαθεί να εδραιώσει περαιτέρω τη θέση της ως «φρουρός».

«...κοστίζει μόνο 25 δολλάρια και εμπεριέχει απλώς λίγη χαρτούρα;

Ίσως, αν είσαι προγραμματιστής στις ΗΠΑ και διαθέτεις πιστωτική κάρτα και άδεια οδήγησης. Προσπάθησε να μπεις στη θέση ενός φοιτητή στην υποσαχάρια Αφρική, ή ενός αντιφρονούντα στη Μιανμάρ, ή ενός εθελοντή που συντηρεί μια εφαρμογή για την υγεία της κοινότητας. Το κόστος δεν είναι μόνο οικονομικό: παραδίδεις την ταυτότητα που σου έχει εκδώσει η κυβέρνηση και τα αποδεικτικά στοιχεία των κλειδιών υπογραφής σου σε μια εταιρεία που συμμορφώνεται συστηματικά με τις απαιτήσεις κυβερνήσεων να αφαιρέσει εφαρμογές και να εκθέσει προγραμματιστές.

Αντιστάσου

Όλοι

Προγραμματιστές

Μην εγγραφείς. Μην μπεις στο πρόγραμμα κάνοντας εγγραφή στην Κονσόλα Προγραμματιστών Android και μην αποδεχτείς τους αμετάκλητους Όρους και Προϋποθέσεις τους. Μην επαληθεύσεις την ταυτότητά σου. Μη μπεις στο χορό.

Το σχέδιο της Google δουλεύει μόνο εάν οι προγραμματιστές εγγραφούν. Μην το κάνεις.

Εργαζόμενοι της Google

Αν γνωρίζεις κάτι σχετικά με την τεχνική υλοποίηση ή εσωτερική λογική του προγράμματος, επικοινώνησε με τη διεύθυνση tips@keepandroidopen.org από μία συσκευή εκτός του εργασιακού σου χώρου και μέσω ενός λογαριασμού που δεν είναι Gmail. Εγγυημένη απόλυτη εμπιστευτικότητα.

Ολοί οσοι αντιτίθενται…

71 οργανισμοί από 23 χώρες έχουν υπογράψει την ανοιχτή επιστολή

Digitale Gesellschaft digitale-gesellschaft.ch MetaBrainz Foundation metabrainz.org Software Liberty Association of Taiwan slat.org.tw The Calyx Institute calyx.org The Center for Digital Progress (D64) d-64.org GitHub Store github-store.org Fedimedia fedimedia.it The App Fair Project appfair.org The Tor Project torproject.org Associação Nacional para o Software Livre (ANSOL) ansol.org AdGuard adguard.com GNOME Foundation gnome.org FACiL facil.qc.ca April april.org Molly molly.im Brave brave.com European Digital Rights (EDRi) edri.org Data Rights datarights.ngo Codeberg e.V. codeberg.org IzzyOnDroid izzyondroid.org Italian Linux Society ils.org The Digital Rights Foundation digitalrightsfoundation.pk Fastmail fastmail.com Digital Rights Watch digitalrightswatch.org.au CryptPad cryptpad.org FUTO futo.org The OpenStreetMap Foundation (OSMF) osmfoundation.org Proton AG proton.me iodé iode.tech OpenMedia openmedia.org LineageOS lineageos.org The Chaos Computer Club (CCC) ccc.de epicenter.works – for digital rights epicenter.works The European Consumer Organisation (BEUC) beuc.eu Software Freedom Conservancy sfconservancy.org ARTICLE 19 article19.org The Guardian Project guardianproject.info The Free Software Foundation (FSF) fsf.org VideoLAN videolan.org The Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) fsfe.org F-Droid f-droid.org Open Web Advocacy open-web-advocacy.org Privacy Guides privacyguides.org Vivaldi Technologies AS vivaldi.com /e/ Foundation e.foundation FULU Foundation fulu.org Rocky Linux rockylinux.org Techlore techlore.tech Open Rights Group (ORG) openrightsgroup.org Tuta Mail tuta.com Obtainium obtainium.imranr.dev Technopolice Bruxelles technopolice.be XMPP Standards Foundation xmpp.org KDE e.V. kde.org GrapheneOS Foundation grapheneos.org Osservatorio Nessuno OdV osservatorionessuno.org Nextcloud nextcloud.com JMP.chat jmp.chat Aurora Store auroraoss.com Cryptee crypt.ee La Quadrature du Net laquadrature.net Ghostery ghostery.com microG microg.org OW2 ow2.org GNU/Linux València gnulinuxvalencia.org Rossmann Group rossmanngroup.com FOSDEM fosdem.org Fundación Karisma karisma.org.co UnifiedPush unifiedpush.org The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) eff.org Forbrukerrådet forbrukerradet.no

Διάβασε ολόκληρη την ανοιχτή επιστολή και ευχαρίστησε τους υπογράφοντες →

Τι λένε

Δημοσιογράφοι τεχνολογίας

"We all know that's a load of bullshit. Adding a goddamn 24-hour waiting period is batshit insanity."

Thom Holwerda, OSnews

"Google will require developer verification to install Android apps, including sideloading"

9to5Google

"Google's new developer rules could threaten sideloading and F-Droid's future"

Gizmochina

"Google's new ID requirements could destroy independent app stores"

TechSpot

"Android Security or Vendor Lock-In? Google's New Sideloading Rules Smell Fishy"

It's FOSS News

"Google's Requirement For All Android Developers To Register And Be Verified Threatens To Close Down Open Source App Store F-Droid"

Techdirt

"F-Droid says Google's new sideloading restrictions will kill the project"

Ars Technica

"Resistance to Google's Android verification grows among developers"

Techzine EU

"Keep Android Open"

Linux Magazine

"Google's Attack on Sideloading Will Rob Android of One of Its Best Features"

How-To Geek

"Google kneecaps indie Android devs, forces them to register"

The Register

"Google's Android developer verification program draws pushback"

InfoWorld

"F-Droid Says Google Is Lying About the Future of Sideloading on Android"

How-To Geek

"Google's Attack on Sideloading Will Rob Android of One of Its Best Features"

How-To Geek

"Android's sideloading limits are its most anti-consumer move yet"

MakeUseOf

"Google's Apple envy threatens to dismantle Android's open legacy"

Ars Technica

"Android app store provider Aptoide hits Google with fresh lawsuit alleging monopoly and anticompetitive chokehold"

Benzinga

"Sideloading on Android? Soon It'll Be Like a TSA Check for Apps"

Android Headlines

"F-Droid Slams Google for Misleading Users About Android's App Verification"

Android Headlines

"Google's developer registration 'decree' means the end for alternative app stores"

Cybernews

"Open-Source Android Apps Threatened by Google's New Policy"

Datamation

"F-Droid project threatened by Google's new dev registration rules"

Bleeping Computer

"'Keep Android Open' Movement Challenges Google's Developer Verification Rule"

Open Source For U

"Open-Source Android Apps at Risk Under Google's New Decree"

TechRepublic

"Google Clamps down On Android's Openness"

Internet Freedom Foundation (India)

"Sideloading on Android? Soon It'll Be Like a TSA Check for Apps"

Android Headlines

"This will wipe out Android as an actual alternative to Apple's mobile OS offerings."

Hackaday

"Keep Android Open – Abwehr gegen Verbot anonymer Apps von Google"

heise online

"I've been an Android user for almost 15 years -- and Google's sideloading changes are pushing me back to iPhone"

Tom's Guide

"Google says it's making Android sideloading 'high-friction' to better warn users about potential risks"

XDA Developers

"Over 67 groups urge the company to drop ID checks for apps distributed outside Play"

The Register

"Open letter warns mandatory registration 'threatens innovation, competition, privacy and user freedom'"

Infosecurity Magazine

"Google's dev registration plan 'will end the F-Droid project'"

The Register

"Google plans to block side-loading like Apple, declaring war on Android freedom"

Tuta Blog

"Android, Epic, and What's Really Behind Google's 'Existential' Threat to F-Droid"

Slashdot

"An 'existential' threat to alternative app stores"

The New Stack

"Google will require developer verification for Android apps outside the Play Store"

TechCrunch

"Google will verify Android developers distributing apps outside the Play store"

The Verge

"Google's New Developer Rules Threaten to End the F-Droid Open-Source App Store"

How-To Geek

"Google's New Developer ID Rule Could Harm F-Droid"

Reclaim The Net

"Sideloading is dead for all intents and purposes. The Android you know and love is slowly disappearing."

Android Police

"It effectively makes the Play Store a monopoly without actually mandating that it is a monopoly."

I-Programmer

"Google will make you wait 24 hours to sideload Android apps"

How-To Geek

"F-Droid Says Google Is Lying About the Future of Sideloading on Android"

How-To Geek

"I've been an Android user for almost 15 years -- and Google's sideloading changes are pushing me back to iPhone"

Tom's Guide

"Google is restricting one of Android's most important features, and users are outraged"

SlashGear

Editorials & ανάλυση

Οργανισμοί & ανοιχτές επιστολές

"MEP Christel Schaldemose formally questioned whether Google's mandatory central registration is compatible with the Digital Markets Act."

European Parliament

"Google's abusive approach to the Android operating system has only gotten worse in recent years. Software freedom is sorely lacking in the 'computers in our pockets' we call cell phones."

Free Software Foundation

"This invasion of privacy of developers is not just an overreach of Google's authority over Android, but also jeopardizes developer safety."

Software Freedom Conservancy

"Google will cut off independent developers to Android if they do not register with Google first. This will kill independent platforms like F-Droid and severely impede FLOSS devs from creating apps for Android."

KDE

"There are governments who might very much like to know the names of the developers of those applications so that they can go after them."

Electronic Frontier Foundation

"Centralised, intransparent security architectures certainly help secure monetization and the market by locking out competitors."

Nextcloud

"Nearly 50 organizations published an open letter opposing what they characterize as a 'kill switch for the open ecosystem.'"

Tech-ish Kenya

"Verification just confirms who's behind the app, it doesn't guarantee clean code or rule out malicious behavior."

AdGuard

"This extends Google's gatekeeping authority beyond its own marketplace into distribution channels where it has no legitimate operational role."

Open letter, over 67 signatory organizations

"A centralized global registration system for Android will inevitably chill this work. Those communities are likely to drop out of developing for Android altogether."

Electronic Frontier Foundation

"Remember: It's your phone, your data, your freedom. Don't let Google take it away."

Tuta

"Google Play itself has repeatedly hosted malware, proving that corporate gatekeeping doesn't guarantee user protection."

F-Droid

"Google's developer verification policy creates a centralized database, controlled by a single corporation, containing the real-world identity of every person who writes software for Android."

Brave

"If it were to be put into effect, the developer registration decree will end the F-Droid project and other free/open source app distribution sources as we know them today."

F-Droid

"We are running out of time until Google becomes the gate-keeper of all users devices."

F-Droid

"Your Smartphone, Their Rules: How App Stores Enable Corporate-Government Censorship."

ACLU

"Unilaterally consolidating power to approve software into the hands of a single unaccountable corporation is a threat to digital sovereignty everywhere."

Nextcloud

"Independent software distribution on Android will now require Google's explicit permission."

AdGuard

"Developers who build privacy-first browsers, encrypted messaging apps, VPNs, Tor-based software or tools for journalists and activists would be required to upload government ID to Google. These developers are unlikely to trust Google and might stop developing for Android."

Brave

"Android's biggest strength has always been its openness. That's what attracted developers and users in the first place."

AdGuard

"Changes would impose barriers to entry for individual developers, small teams and volunteer projects by imposing fees, identity checks and terms that may not align with the principles of an open ecosystem."

Infosecurity Magazine

"For developers building tools specifically designed to protect user privacy, being forced to surrender their own personal data as a precondition for distribution is deeply contradictory."

AdGuard

"Forcing software creators into a centralized registration scheme is as egregious as forcing writers and artists to register with a central authority."

F-Droid

"We unequivocally advise against signing up for this program, now or ever."

F-Droid Open Letter

"A policy that forces every Android developer to hand their identity to Google, regardless of whether they use Google's services, makes Android a less-open and less-private platform."

Brave

"When you set up a gate, you invite authorities to use it to block things they don't like. And when you build a database, you invite governments to try to get access."

Electronic Frontier Foundation

"Ultimately, Google's plan will stop you from owning your Android phone."

Tuta

"Google is turning Android into a walled garden monopoly. We must prevent it."

Osservatorio Nessuno

"This is a profound change, one that shatters the entire premise of the Android ecosystem, long regarded as the antithesis of the closed Apple ecosystem."

AdGuard

"The European Pirate Party called for proportionate and transparent measures that ensure security without restricting innovation, limiting anonymity, or distorting competition."

European Pirate Party

"Developers who choose not to use Google's services should not be forced to register with, and submit to the judgement of, Google."

Open letter, over 67 signatory organizations

"While Android used to be praised for its freedom and independence, it will become a closed shop just like Apple."

Tuta

YouTubers & δημιουργοί

"Google is doing to Android what Microsoft once tried to do to the web. Embrace, extend, extinguish. Just wrapped in a shinier open-source package."

ChiefGyk3D – YouTube

"I'm not using the word 'phone.' I'm using the word 'computer.' This has over 8 GB of RAM, a terabyte of storage. It's a computer. And I'm also not going to be using words like 'sideload.' When you download an exe file onto your Windows computer, you've installed an application. You haven't 'sideloaded' something."

Louis Rossmann – YouTube

"The fact of the matter is, this is my device. I paid a lot of money for it. I should be able to do with it what I want."

Switched to Linux – YouTube

"Google has been carefully watching from the sidelines to see what exactly it is that Apple can get away with."

Linus Sebastian, LMG Clips – YouTube

"Google is setting a requirement that only they can fulfill, forcing developers to go through Google and killing off thousands of apps. Countless users stranded."

Techlore – YouTube

"Google is removing the one key advantage Android has over iOS."

SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube

"Every single time a company takes away your ability to do what you want with what you bought and paid for, every single time they twist a knife, we have to point it out."

Louis Rossmann – YouTube

"The widely-circulated narrative that Google already backed down from this is false. They didn't, and that misunderstanding may be the most dangerous part of the story right now."

Techlore – YouTube

"Google decides what's safe for you, and you don't get a say."

fireborn – Blog

"Google isn't testing this in the US or Europe first. They're starting in countries like Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand. Why? Because these are massive growth markets where regulation is weaker. By the time regulators catch up, the damage will already be done."

ChiefGyk3D – YouTube

"Imagine Dell told you that you could no longer install any operating system other than Windows on your laptop. That's what Google is doing to your phone."

SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube

"F-Droid is basically saying that the new Google developer registration process will likely kill the open-source app store entirely."

The Linux Experiment – YouTube

"If I'm going to be trapped in a walled garden anyway, I'll take the one that's built properly."

fireborn – Blog

"Follow the money. Google makes money when apps are downloaded from its store. Google has completely forgotten about its earlier company motto: Don't be evil."

Tuta Blog – Blog

"When you download applications, you've simply installed an application. I don't want to use words like 'sideload.'"

SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube

"This is an iPhone now. I didn't want to buy an iPhone. I use Android because it gives me freedom. If you are not going to give me freedom with my computer, then why would I buy your stuff anymore?"

Louis Rossmann – YouTube

"Google keeps getting in as much trouble as Apple when Google is half evil and Apple is full evil. So there are probably people inside Google saying, 'Why not just go full evil?'"

Louis Rossmann – YouTube

"I have really no more strong reason to not recommend you all get iPhones, because this just is pretty much an iPhone with a Google logo on it at this point."

Techlore – YouTube

"Your device, their rules. The phone you bought and paid for is no longer really yours."

Tuta Blog – Blog

"Android has become what they set out to destroy."

Linus Sebastian, LMG Clips – YouTube

"Google already can disable malware that they find on your device. It's already a built-in feature. So what is developer registration actually adding here? Is it security or control? You decide."

Techlore – YouTube

"This means you can't sideload an app from an unofficial source. But it could also be used to lock the ecosystem so we're forced to install only Google apps on approved Google OS versions."

Rob Braxman Tech – Locals

"That's not openness. That is control."

ChiefGyk3D – YouTube

"Developers of privacy-focused tools and emulators will have to dox themselves, making them vulnerable to government agencies or legal action."

SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube

"A world where two tech companies from the same city that dominate all of our mobile devices both require centralized developer registration is a world with one more lever for surveillance, one more checkpoint for censorship."

Techlore – YouTube

"This represents the last real safe place for free and open-source software in the entire mobile ecosystem. Once it's gone, it's gone. And we're going to spend the next decade trying to claw it back."

Techlore – YouTube

Προγραμματιστές & κοινότητα

"Android was never actually open and now they are abandoning even the thin pretense."

Tiraon, Tildes

"I still remember how in the early days of Android vs iOS discussions, the main point was 'but it's OPEN!' The word 'open' was used as a comma by Google people. It was The Thing. The Difference. Good vs Evil and all that."

jwr, Hacker News

"For 'security' -- always security with these assholes. They're just building the walls of the walled garden higher."

lynxy, Tildes

"It's not cyclic. It's a ratchet and it gets tighter and tighter."

BenjaminRi, Lobsters

"There's an entire genre of scamming where the scammers spend months building rapport with their victims before cashing out. One day is nothing."

free_bip (on the 24-hour wait defeating scammers), Hacker News

"It took them 17 years to finally pull the cage all the way shut."

Apocryphon, Hacker News

"Google's plan to require developer verification would give Google and governments the ability to ban any app."

Zak, Hacker News

"Can't come at a worse time. People are just learning to make things through vibe coding, and they're gonna want to put their own apps on their phones. And now Google says no."

Serinus, Lemmy

"This is a war on users that want to keep control of their phones and when it's done, you will not be able to escape the enshittification."

ikidd, Lemmy

"Google selling Android as both open source and open to running any software you like in order to quickly gain market share, only to break those promises after driving competing platforms out of the market is nothing more than fraud."

GeekyBear, Hacker News

"'Sideload' is like 'jaywalking'; seeks to stigmatize humans being human."

tejtm, Hacker News

"The phrase 'sideload' is psychological propaganda we are all best off rejecting."

WaffleMonster, Slashdot

"Anyone else thinking this looks like a precursor to banning Signal and similar? 1) Put Google in control of what you can install. 2) Get Google to block it."

harry8, Hacker News

"Google seems to actively hate people who develop for their platforms."

hbn, Hacker News

"After 15 years of professional development on Android I too am now thinking about switching my focus to something different. And it sucks."

MrDresden, Hacker News

"Antitrust action is badly needed. It is ridiculous that I need permission from my device manufacturer to install software on hardware I own."

jim201, Hacker News

"If your country is ever in the crosshairs of 'American interests' and bears the brunt of its sanctions, it is possible that you cannot install apps from your fellow citizens. Your own local government, bank, and store apps."

devsda, Hacker News

"If Android's sandbox and permission systems actually worked, then the mere act of installing an app from an arbitrary source would be as harmless as visiting an arbitrary website."

mwcampbell, Lobsters

"I teach digital literacy and 99% of unsavory software I encounter on people's phones come from the Play Store or App Store. I will believe they're serious about protecting users when I see them do something about the crap ton of borderline scam apps infesting their stores."

1995ToyotaCorolla, Lemmy

"If I go down this path, I will stop all development on Android. I implore all other developers to resist this. This will completely lock down the platform forever, there will be no going back."

BatteryMountain, Hacker News

"Android is for everyone, provided they submit to Google exclusively."

gumby271, Hacker News

"Brazil government app refuses to operate with developer mode on."

flykespice (developer in Brazil), Hacker News

"Give me liberty or give me Symbian."

masterofn001, Lemmy

"I buy a device with my own money, which I supposedly then own, but then I need to ask some corporation permission to use it."

askonomm, Hacker News

"It is a disgrace how Google has managed this situation. The promised 'advanced flow' hasn't appeared in any Android 16 or 17 betas. Google is quietly proceeding with the original lockdown."

fermigier, Hacker News

"Google's own Play Store had over 600 million malware downloads. They keep talking about 'security' but their own store is crawling with fake apps and straight up malware while actual useful stuff gets buried or rejected."

Historical-Employ129 (324 upvotes), Reddit

"Making it harder makes it harder to treat ourselves. Software like AndroidAPS is unique. It's hard to find or very expensive and inferior in the proprietary market."

pimeys (diabetic user on life-critical medical software), Lobsters

"They have stolen a free product and are now actively locking out the people who built it."

TheTearMiser, Lemmy

"We are talking about something categorically worse than vendor lock-in: Collective vendor lock-in."

anordal, Lobsters

"The fundamental problem is that we are relying on the good graces of Google to keep Android open, despite the fact that it often runs contrary to their goals as a $4T for-profit behemoth. The 'don't be evil' days are very far behind us."

paxys, Hacker News

"The war on General Purpose Computing is the death of innovation and a direct attack on digital freedom."

layfellow, Hacker News

"Whatever Google is doing kind of scares me. We have a big DIY community of diabetics in Germany running tools like AndroidAPS that cannot ever be distributed through official channels."

pimeys (Type 1 diabetic, DIY medical software), Lobsters

"Google now has a flag on my phone they can control remotely to keep me from accessing the apps I want."

vala, Lemmy

"Twice I have had to deal with Google silently disabling my drone app to the point I had to buy an older phone to perform work. When I purchase a device that works with another device, under no circumstances should I be at the mercy of any updates they make."

cbrophoto (drone professional), Reddit

"Signal, VPNs -- they'll have a list of everyone opting out of government-mandated backdoors."

Max-P, Lemmy

"I hate this so much. More and more I get the feeling I have no control over the devices I own. My fear is that Windows will eventually follow. For security reasons of course. It's the path we're on now."

cheesyvoetjes, Reddit

"Requiring a government ID to distribute software. Holy shit. If you are a kid and want to create a game for your friends, you better get that birth certificate ready!"

llitz, Reddit

"Once deployed, there's a near 100% chance of such a mechanism being used for evil."

Zak, Lemmy

"Modern life practically forces you to put all your eggs into a phone controlled by one of two profit-seeking companies."

koala, Lobsters

"Social engineering is destroyed with education, not with restriction and control. Trading freedom for safety eliminates both."

survirtual, Hacker News

"Google has no right to be my parent. As long as I can't reject paternalism, I don't believe for a second this is done with the well-being of scam victims as the main priority."

gspr, Lobsters

"You are essentially a child to them. The difference is society has decided not to step in to protect you from your abusive parents."

globular-toast, Hacker News

"Don't beg. Don't get in a position that freedoms depend on the whims of a corporation or willingness of a government to regulate them. Build."

jzb, Lobsters

"Software gatekeeping is a threat to human rights. Just recently an app to track ICE was banned from the iOS app store even though this should clearly be protected first amendment speech."

gthing, Reddit

"Some time in the future, we will look back to this era and ask ourselves what went wrong."

BenjaminRi, Lobsters

"We need to start treating phones differently. We're entering a world where we can't choose what we run on them. Their primary purpose is to gather data on us and serve us advertising, they're engineered for addiction, yet engaging in the world is immensely difficult without one."

specproc, Hacker News

"The open Android I knew and loved is long gone."

girvo, Hacker News

"You have no right telling me what I can and cannot run on my own devices."

MrZander, Hacker News

"My Pixel 6 just broke, and after 15 years of using Android, I've finally been convinced to move to iOS. If I must live in a walled garden, I suppose I'll choose the one with nicer flowers."

yonato, Hacker News

"If the likes of Google, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, and others have their way, you will not own your computer; those companies will effectively own your computers."

RUs1729, Slashdot

"I want to deploy apps on my device. They are my apps, it's my device, and I should not be required to ask for permission to do so."

fsniper, Hacker News

"Google wants the authority of a gatekeeper without the overhead of human accountability."

afferi300rina, Hacker News

"They're boiling the frog -- slowly removing features until all choice is gone."

hn92726819, Hacker News

"This isn't just a competition between app stores; it's a struggle for choice and dignity. Your phone shouldn't be a cage carefully constructed by others, but an extension of your own will."

renshijian, Hacker News

"Play store is full of scam apps, F-Droid isn't, but Play Store is considered secure. It's all theatre."

gcupc, Lobsters

"Any time someone puts a lock on something that belongs to you, and won't give you a key, they're not doing it for your benefit."

vord (quoting Cory Doctorow), Tildes

"All the banking and payment apps in India refuse to open if you have developer mode on."

nibbleyou (developer in India), Hacker News

"Computing is infrastructure. Personal computers are a means of expressing agency. This is like banning people from moving furniture around their house without approval from mortgage lenders."

wervenyt, Tildes

"Years ago, I wondered how Google would try to get away with locking down Android and shutting the cage door after capturing such a large dependent user base. Now I see how they are trying to get away with it."

chaznabin, Reddit

Φωνές απο τη συλλογή υπογραφών

"Google has shown a lack of respect for user privacy their entire existence. You own your device, you spent hundreds of dollars/Euros for it. It was not a loan by Google, it is yours, and you should control what you use it for. People who want to use only Google verified apps are free to do so without having to infringe on the rights of the people knowledgeable enough to make the decision to use apps from outside Google's Play store. Google and others have long criticized Apple for this exact thing, to the point that they're in a lawsuit for it. For Google to try this shows a complete lack of respect for the customer, a lack of integrity, and complete and utter hypocrisy. If I want to make a personal app to control a toy I made and programmed, why should I have to give Google my personal information, jump through extra hoops, give them my code, and PAY them for the privilege of doing my own work? It's ridiculous. It's pure corporate greed. More than that, it's an attempt from Google to control your device. Yet another avenue for censorship, surveillance, and the road towards a world without any freedom, all under the guise of "safety." This is not just an attack on you and your device. This is an attack on your freedom as an individual and your right to your privacy and choice. This shouldn't just be a petition, this needs to be nonnegotiable. "

Paul, change.org

"Choosing Android was choosing a degree of freedom and opportunity to use my device like it was device. The all the anti-competitive legislation, it is impossible to fathom how this move to wall-off the ecosystem and close the source could be suggested. This "update" would actually reduce the function and privacy opportunities of the device I OWN. This is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4Upf_B9RLQ If Google continues course, I would choose Apple as the lesser of two evils, with more polished hardware. "

Sean, change.org

"Android users have had the ability to use APKs for so long. It is a major thing that differentiates them from Apple, and something that has prevented me from switching over. Without the freedom of apks, there is nothing keeping me with Android or Google. "

Kayla, change.org

"Yeah i like the big man having control over the phone i bought. Thats the only reason i went to Android. Never again. Hope Android is dying for it "

Tobias, change.org

"The only thing that set Android apart from Apple (and frankly made it objectively better than Apple) is the freedom of control you have over a device you actually own. Removing that ability makes Android no better than Apple, might as well say you don't really own that phone or tablet when you take away such freedoms. "

George, change.org

"Dear Google, you are single handedly destroying the whole purpose for which we use Android. Not only will you see a mass exodus from Google devices/services, you will force the creation of alternative operating systems that allow for user privacy and fredom for app developers. You all are making it harder for yourselves and for us. "

Kevin, change.org

"Google is shooting itself in the foot; this will only influence more people to migrate to iOS. "

Kaue, change.org

"The whole reason I use an Android based device is for the freedom that comes with the phone. If I wanted to be governed by my cellphone manufacturer I would use an iPhone. "

Zachary, change.org

"Google, this is NOT acceptable. You are NOT the gatekeepers of development. You ARE BEING EVIL. "

David, change.org

"The entier reason I left apple is because of Googles open source and user controlled devices, allowing for sideloading APKs as well as giving you ultimate say on if somthing is safe for you. Add in the new OneUI 8 that has more or less stopped users from rooting devices and we might as well just call it the "Apple Google phone" and just shut down google. Let Steve Jobs win as Google/Samsung seem to prefer. "

Jaylin, change.org

"the declaration of independance prolly said something about this... "

john, change.org

"Android should remain open my device my choice hands off Google.Especially in today’s climate I do not want apps or delvelopers identities forward to authoritarian governments I’m looking at you United States. "

Henry, change.org

"Why would anyone use an Android period outside of being able to install applications not “approved” by some walled-garden. Side loading is a dumb term "

Stephen, change.org

"The one positive thing differentiating Android from iOS has been the ability for Android users to make their own choices about what's installed on their devices. Killing that differentiator is the exact opposite of forward progress. "

Ryan, change.org

"Asking an ID for everything is not different from China's ID Citizen Score This is clearly made with the intention to manipulate what people do and learn about "

Verónica, change.org

"We can stand together to save Android and keep downloading what we love on our Android devices! "

Austin, change.org

"This is very clearly about "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish" and Google/Alphabet cashing in on control, rather than any kind of measure for protection or security. The main appeal of Android to most users was the openness, transparency, and extensibility, and with this move, all of these are being harmed. "

Anubis, change.org

"Android has always been about freedom, let's not change that "

Gabriel, change.org

"The sooner this is allowed the sooner our country is gone for good. State control over personal devices will have gone too far. "

April, change.org

"Having a device where you control what does or does not go on it is our right to have. We bought this device and we should have the freedom to do what we want with the device, regardless of the manufacturer or operating system it is on. Allowing this change to happen is just one more step towards a controlled ecosystem; by Google, for Google and this is exactly what they want. "

Clayton, change.org

"Android has been the bastion for users who did not want to accept companies deciding what we do with our devices, it is imperative that users are granted the freedom of choice to install any software they wish, and to develop software to innovate and solve issues that Google or its partners decide is not worth their time. "

Hassan, change.org

"I am genuinely angry about what Google is trying to do by limiting APK usage. This is not some tiny background tweak. This cuts straight into the reason many of us chose Android in the first place. Android meant freedom. It meant I could install what I wanted. It meant developers could share their work without kneeling before a single approval system. It meant that when I bought my phone, it was actually mine. We keep hearing that this is about “security.” And yes, security matters. Nobody wants malware. But there is a real difference between protecting users and controlling them. Give people warnings. Give them tools. Educate them. Do not take away their ability to choose. I am an adult, fully willing and capable of deciding what I install on my own device. When APK usage is restricted, everything narrows. Developers get pushed into one official channel. One review process. One company deciding what is acceptable and what is not. That kind of centralized control should make all of us uncomfortable. It changes the balance of power, and it does it under the soft language of safety and convenience. This is about ownership. If I cannot freely install apps, do I truly own my device? Or am I just using it within boundaries that can shift whenever it best suits a corporation? I hardly think it is extreme to say that when I pay for hardware, I should have complete control over what runs on it. That is not radical. That is basic digital autonomy. And I am not okay with watching that autonomy slowly disappear without saying something. "

Brooke, change.org

"This change will kill one of the biggest reasons to go Android-the freedom to choose what software YOU want to run. Without this freedom, Android becomes significantly less differentiable to iOS, and NOT in a good way. "

Muhammad, change.org

"We already can't chose our OS and can't choosing the app is discussing. "

Alihan, change.org

"Boydan girmek lazım "

Said, change.org

"Dear Google, As a life-long Android user, the perspective of this program ever coming into place is simply devastating. The Android Project was built with the promise of open-source software, community-driven development and digital freedom at its core. This promise has been a vital part of its success, from its humble beginnings to the widely popular and prolific ecosystem we have today. Any measure that does not fully respect these core values is a direct threat to the Android Project as a whole and a betrayal of its community. I believe the "Android developer verification requirements" program as it stands is such a measure. Therefore, I urge everybody involved at Google to seriously reconsider this program to the benefit of the Android Project and its community. Sincerely- "

Yoann, change.org

"Sideloading is genuinley the one actual reason I choose android phones over Apple. Without it, the switch is actually negligble. This is not the business decision to make. "

Leon, change.org

"APPLE wAS GONE LONG AGO NOW WHERE WILL WE GO? "

henry, change.org

"Google is Google's own worst enemy. If this goes through, I will never use any of their services ever again. GOOGLE IS A BAD ACTOR AND A BAD COMPANY! WHAT HAPPENED TO "DON'T BE EVIL"?!?! "

Ryan, change.org

"It's not sideloading. It's installing an application on a personal computing device I own and payed for... This move is unacceptable. "

Benjamin, change.org

"Freedom to think and develop without cynicism. "

David, change.org

"Google sucks if it changes android and will burn! "

Gage, change.org

"As a consumer, I bought and use Android platform devices because I care about my privacy and I care about accessing third-party applications that are not strictly on Google's Play Store. I utilize F-Droid and various other third-party app stores, and this would be a major impediment to me. I did not agree to Google pulling the rug from beneath me well after I bought several thousand dollar Android phones and devices. "

Stephen, change.org

"Let's go! Google can be based if we all pray together. "

james, change.org

"It's a no to big brother and feeling myself fold up when I look at my phone "

William, change.org

"After this decision I will just go with iPhone, this was the only reason I was using Android, just making it worse for the consumer, this is not about security but locking down people's choice of store, which in my opinion should be illegal give that we bought our phones and we should be able to do with them as we please "

Colin, change.org

"Its my phone im doing as i please with it "

Brayden, change.org

"Google has been sued up the butt for monopolizing before, and now they're trying again? And on top of these ridiculous surveillance laws all because a few parents can't watch their children, this is just a stupid decision to make. "

Kamareon, change.org

"One of the reasons that I had chosen android over IOS is its open ecosystem, and the ability to side-load my own apps outside of traditional sources to meet my needs, but by locking this down, not only does this destroy the open-source movement, but it also stalls and even halts development all-together, which means that you will no longer be able to gain the advantage of "community" improving upon the various aspects of the android operating system. "

gabi, change.org

"Smh users should be allowed to install whatever they want "

Challen, change.org

"As a CS Professional and recent CS Grad, the flexibility for Android to allow us to share hobby project apps with friends and family who also use Android is a vital part of the learning experience and what makes Android unique. Requiring paid verification based on government ID will have a stifling effect that will make Android loose the open nature that set it apart from Apple, which has been key to its success for many upcoming CS Students, and for many hobbiests that often lead to professional paths. "

Kyler, change.org

"Welp if APK files limited then there is no need for us to use android from now on. "

Emir, change.org

"I like to have a choice to choose and I understand the risks, that is why I check, Google should not have monopoly over it. "

Rosalie, change.org

"Also consider giving money towards the Graphene OS at grapheneos.org/donate "

Adam, change.org

"This is a step towards global disaster... Letting Google and Apple control any and all functionality you have on your handheld computer is absolutely absurd. The right android phone can be tuned to a perfect workhorse and sidekick, this new Android Developer Verification Requirement would kill any hope of having personalized and properly functional phones whilst letting Google choose exactly what Developers get to provide tools, collect your data, and offer in-app purchases. I think we all know Google has ruined almost every program on these devices already: accessing local files on the device requires that you use their "google files app" which is ridiculous and clearly them trying to take control where they shouldnt; photos is now "google photos"; wallet? google.; calendar? google; want to have a phone without some BS ai or something hard baked into it? well too bad! assistant cant be turned off; these little briefings with ads that pop up when you unlock your phone?; the adds in the weather app?; how about when you want to go to the nearest restaurant, just trust google to take you there i guess. Here's a very important part of all this: notice that Google replaces all of your PRIVATE apps! My files, which are private, are no longer private since by default the files app is a Google app now. My photos, which are private, owned by Google. My super secure offline location which holds my bank cards, very private, now online and stored somewhere by Google, the company that paid millions to cover up a data breach of 53 million users from 2015 to 2018 (if you were wondering why your info shows up on so many dark websites, thanks incognito!). Pretty much in short: Google is trying to own and control society and this pretty much is a huge leap for them to get there. Don't get me started on Apple. "

Kaden, change.org

"As a consumer, i have The right to install applications freely without pressure or retaliation,since ona has The right to choose the applications one needs or uses. Furthermore,Android was designed for free use without restriction and with open source code for allá programmer,developers,and users of The device.This restriction would be illogical and would destroy The esence of Android.I oppose the removal of F-Droid and other third party applications. CONSUMERS SHOULD NOT BE FORCED INTO CHANGES THEY NEITHER WANT NOT SUPOORT;BESIDES BEING PROHIBITED,IT IS ILLEGAL TO DECIDE FOR THE USER.ANDROID IS FANTASTIC BECAUSE EVERY USER CAN PERONALIZE THEIR DEVICE.SOMEONE MIGHT HAVE A SPECIFIC BRAND IN MIND,BUT THEIR DEVICE WILL REFLECT THAT PERSONALIZATION,UNLIKE ¡OS, NO TO BLOCKING THIRD PARTY APPS "

Juan Manuel, change.org

"I strongly oppose this change. Google should HIGHLY reconsider this idea. It's SPECIFICALLY this freedom that makes me go with android to begin with. This freedom of choice is what separates them from Apple. If this change goes into effect you will see many users either switch to Apple, or find any possible alternatives that support these options. "

Zachary, change.org

"Its is unfair and against the law of freedom and privacy. "

Muhammad Asif, change.org

"Please, allow for users to make exceptions or some other control, keep Android flexible. "

Boris, change.org

"we pay for these devices and maintain them. we should be able to do anything we want with them. Locking us out is just greed. Like buying a car. then having to pay ever month to use the heated seats that are already in the car. if anything, let us put a different system on the phone. "

David, change.org

"Top muito bom "

Paulo, change.org

"Android having the ability to sideload apps is a core part of the eco system it's like if you couldn't install a .exe on windows. The core thing some of us went to android for is openness but if they take that away we will leave as fast as we arrived. "

Teddy, change.org

"I'll be concise. This is not the right direction to go. This really is a monopoly and openness is the right choice. You're causing more harm than good and people's freedom of choice needs to be addressed. Thank you. "

Aaron, change.org

"I use Android over iOS specifically for the ability to install the applications I want in the way I want. If I can't do that, I might as well not use an Android phone. "

Jeremy, change.org

"Freedom is fundamental. "

S, change.org

"Funny how a principle as straightforward as “don’t be evil” can still turn out to be surprisingly difficult to live up to. "

JV, change.org

"I dropped iOS and moved to Android when I learned the importance of freedom. If Google makes this movement I don't see what sense makes that change anymore. "

Josh, change.org

"If android isn't open source then it's straight up just a worse iOS literally the only reason we use it is the fact that it's open source 💀 "

Natalia, change.org

"Intelectual property is a disgrace! If what Google is trying to do is normalized it will eventually reach other OSes and it could kill game preservation via emulation. Not only that, they are also trying to normalize putting ridiculous restrictions to the freedom of the developers which could eventually kill open-source or at least make it unimaginably worst! "

Guilherme, change.org

"Removing the ability to side-load apps is an egregious deviation from what made Android better. Android should remain free and open, the experience should not be lobotomized into what ends up being just a "cheaper iPhone". "

Luke, change.org

"I had to begrudgingly install google on my phone recently, and it's so difficult to get it off. I'm probably going to install graphene on the phone in the near future, so I don't have to consent to everything and get tracked constantly. "

Hank, change.org

"Let me preface this. Sideloading is *installing a program on a personal computer,* for all that it's phone shaped. You might be used to this behavior from iOS, but even Mac PCs will let you install applications that are unsigned and made by other people, and on the closed-source Windows environment it's still *the main way to get applications,* despite there now being two different official app stores on that platform. Nothing needs to be said about the various Linux/Unix environments. The centralized registration of both apps and developers is not the right approach. It creates a monopoly over who can be an Android developer and will greatly limit the desire to develop apps if it is no longer something that can be done as a hobby but a slow, complicated expense with the requirement to identify oneself. I've done some hobbyist development, but I would not have learned coding if these were the standards I had to meet, and I'd only be losing money. It encourages turning a problem-solving hobby project others might benefit from into a cash grab, or just discourages it entirely. It will in one blow destroy all apps which are no longer maintained, or those who are developed by people who can't or won't escrow their identities with Google, including myself. It also integrates Google's control over the phone even more deeply into how even the phone's software runs, locking these allegedly open devices even more under Google's remote control, and which is already a challenge for makers of de-Googled devices. I strongly suspect it will also become used to apply arbitrary limitations to developers (read the XScreenSaver privacy policy if you'd like to know more) and block many of the tools we currently take for granted, such as those used to root phones. After all, rooting a phone would likely permit installing arbitrary apps, and Google's security model already "distrusts" those devices to the point that they break e.g. banking apps or DRM, so why would they allow something if it conflicts with their security model and they can now control any code that runs on your device? In the end, this WILL be used by Google to permanently remove many people's ability to develop apps on Android at all, likely because those people made tools that provided capabilities Google is not willing to offer or let exist on the free market anymore. The ID requirement will prevent them from creating new accounts and the devices will retroactively block even their installed apps from working while preventing those developers, those _people,_ from making more even on other stores (if other stores even continue existing, given that they would effectively become arms of Google just to have the apps work). "

Russell, change.org

"I have the right to download apps made from developers I trust. You do not make that decision for me. Hands off! "

Danielle, change.org

"Third party apps make my phone so much more functional and versatile for my own personal needs. It's why I choose Android over Apple. Giving less options to all of us will only make the user experience worse for everyone. "

Jorri, change.org

"The possibility of one of the only features that could jumpstart and maintain rising developers ambitions and the Android community; being able to install any files into their systems getting smothered is a nightmare for anyone who has been sticking to Android themselves due to its customization (I will protect my self-made Miku UI with my life). Going against the reasons of Android's strengths WILL be a bad idea and would force the people to find lower alternatives, whether they are better or not can't be gauged when this move destroys the baseline of a free and modifiable OS. Please listen to the community that is yelling to not aim at poor Bugdroid's shins... "

Ken, change.org

"This is the entire point of many people using Android in the first place, you take this away and something new will come along and replace you. "

Jacob, change.org

"Being free and open is the number one reason I use Android. If that were to go away, it would reduce its competitiveness with ios "

Vivian, change.org

"Don't be evil "

Qihang, change.org

"keeping android open enables far more indie studios to continue to operate on android, and thats what i love, i love finding the most random game, and not having to worry about if its on one store or the other, i can just download it keep it open, please "

Evan, change.org

"Google doing this would not only reduce consumer rights but also create a monopoly. I do not approve of this. "

Alexis, change.org

"It is a based no to monopolization of Android from Google. Stop giving them all the power. Together we can ask for change. "

Claudia, change.org

"Keep Android Open. We are not letting you form a monopoly, Google. It's OUR devices. If you continue with this, you'll remove one of the only reasons most people are not with Apple: freedom. So think about it. "

Bruno Leonel, change.org

"I've always appreciated Google for it's support of open source projects. This is why the recent trend to lock-in this user's is worrying. I believe Google doesn't need to resort to such draconian measures to grow. It's part growth is proof of this fact "

Kanwar, change.org

"I personally knew Android because of it's open nature. Seeing this made me heartbroken. I am all about rooting so sideloading is a crucial part in some rooting operations I do on my device. Now I can't have any more cool mods on my device anymore. Thanks Google. "

chau, change.org

"I don't think that we should be filtered into buying something we do not want. Something as simply as a weather app should be free, news should be free, but the services that's being offered in app stores as free is usually filled with ads that leak personal information. "

Andre, change.org

"I got an android phone in order to limit the harvesting of my personal data. Steps like these tighten the screws of surveillance and reduce our freedom to use our own devices as we see fit "

N, change.org

"This restriction simply ruins the entire premise that the android community has based itself on. It deprives users of the basic freedom that they rightfully deserve to have, since they acquired and rightfully paid for their device(s). It's another step into censorship and a monopoly under the premise of "security". The Google Play Store itself is a perpetrator of insecurity and restricting the developer base won't make it any better. If this is pushed foward, I will cease to use any android system that uses Google Play Services. "

Maria, change.org

"Android giving users choice has been the staple point of android OS. Removing choices like sideloading apps is not the move. I develop apps for myself, I do not want to be "an approved developer" I don't have time nor care for that. This action also is the beginning of censorship, and monopolization of android OS. Android started as an open operating system, you have simply turned it into a reskinned Apple OS. Your choice to go anti-consumer is going to hurt. You are not "protecting" anyone "

lucas, change.org

"Users don't deserve the Google jail cell to shrink and encroach any further "

Ben, change.org

"I have found great use of android APKs. Because of them I can run comunity devoulped apps like Winalator, a Wine wraper for android, allows me to play windows games on my phone. Theres also PhoneVR, a free and open source app allowing me and many others to rededicate old phones into capable VR headsets, for free! I also get to play old games like Asphalt 8 retry, a mod that fixes alot of the pay-to-win gripes of Asphalt 8's current form. Same goes for Bad Piggies reborn, a free comunity mod adding loads of content and improvments to the origonal game! Not to mention open source app stores like FDroid. By locking down android, your losing support from people like me. Do you really want to kill the reason android is great? Just for a few dollars more? Are you going to just dismiss the people that made you great? We're not just numbers on a spread sheet you know, we're people too. We don't need protected by governments and companys. All that does is remove freedom, dehummanize people, and make people who cant think for themselfs. Whats next? Burning books? In the direction we're heading, we're not far from becoming the socity in Ferenheight 451. "

George, change.org

"Users own their devices and should be able to install software they choose on them. "

Paul, change.org

"i liked playing gta sa on my droid dont ruin some kids childhood "

Husam, change.org

"Google, which has long positioned itself as a defender of freedom on the internet, now seems to be taking worrying steps by trying to limit the installation of apps outside of the Google Play Store. This move not only restricts users' freedom of choice, but also centralizes even more power in the hands of a single corporation, creating a closed and controlled environment. By forcing developers to comply with its rules and fees, Google eliminates the possibility of cheaper or even free alternatives, making the Android ecosystem more restricted and expensive. Moreover, this decision goes against the very essence of Android, which has always been based on freedom of customization and access. It's a setback for users who seek greater control over their devices and privacy. Limiting app installations outside the Play Store is not just a matter of convenience, but a matter of respecting user autonomy. "

Júnior, change.org

"This change would effectively prevent any normal user from escaping the constant for profit schemes you'll find on the play store. Kids deserve games that don't try to coerce money out of them "

Jody, change.org

"Please don't let Google screw us over with this now! I hope we win and they don't do this! "

Saul, change.org

"Every year my tech gets less and less useful, it seems like every time I look away Alphabet adds more hurdles to jump over simply to have basic access to MY device. Google is a glorified intelligence agency conjured from the depths of DARPA and the CIA. They're allowed to retain their monopoly, not only because of the capitalist dystopia we live in, but because they're a thinly veiled arm of our criminal government, being welded like a cudgel against not only China's much superior tech industry, but the entire world in the form of the tailor made, digital echo chambers they lock us in. "

Steven, change.org

"This change is disastrous for both the privacy of developers and the general health of the open source software community for android. Keep Android Open!! Let us install what we want, without asking for your permission. "

Thomas, change.org

"I choose to use Android as it gives me the ability to freely use my mobile phone the way I intend to. I would like to continue developing apps as a hobby without needing to be an "approved developer" and sharing my government issued identity with Google. "

Christian, change.org

"First step to digital Gulag "

Sergio, change.org

"Don't do this, I will never spend more than 100$ on an android or any phone ever again. Google, get smart. "

Jamell, change.org

"Me and many of my peers have been android users for over a decade, mainly due to the open nature and freedom to use my device as I wish without friction. Revoking this freedom by forcing developers into this program will harm developer privacy and freedom of speech, accessibility of development, user control over their devices, and preservation of older apps. It's not as easy as move to another OS, as the only other option is iOS and alternatives don't have as many applications needed for general day to day life. This is an overreach of power feigning "caring about user safety" to restrict user and developer freedoms "

Natasha, change.org

"Google removing the freedom to install whatever software on MY device that I paid for and own goes against the android ethos. It was built on being an open project that anyone can change and use, this is why I use android over other companys. I use Fdroid for all of my apps and like to make and load my own for my own useage. If this is taken away it will be a great loss to android. "

Perry, change.org

"#NoMoreCensorship "

Russell, change.org

"The freedom that Android offered was its defining feature. Without that freedom, it is no different than iOS. So when I go to buy my next phone, at least Apple hasn't pulled the rug out from under me, just saying... "

Daniel, change.org

"Keep android open source, resist surveillance and ID verification. Consider switching to Grapheneos "

Andrew, change.org

"Without sideloading in Android, it will be impossible for us to install any app outside the Google Play Store, making traditional unverified sideloading much more difficult on certified devices, and therefore blocking it in 2027. This isn’t about protection here. It was more like the beginning of censorship, and monopolization of android OS. Let make our voices heard "

Jacob, change.org

"If this goes in effect there's literally no reason for me to stay on android. Would likely either go graphene but that feels up in the air for long term support so I guess that leaves apple. And I already hate walled gardens. Especially when the play store is basically just a malware repository. I'm so tired of corps eroding our freedoms. Why must everything be enshitified this day an age. "

Coleman, change.org

"Hey Google. You are a silent cancer. You've engulfed everything in your path for decades: true innovation, billions of unsuspecting people's data, healthy competition, and choice. You've been sued, repeatedly fined, and ordered to break up your monopoly (you haven't), yet you keep metastasizing. I could cite historical, philosophical, religious, even SciFi metaphors of what you are, but "plague" is sufficient. For the love of humanity, if in fact there's anyone left at Plague HQ who still identifies as human, keep your metastatic tentacles off the Android Developer Platform. You've done enough harm already. Signed, The last cancer-free organ you have yet to destroy "

Andromeda, change.org

"APK or go away "

Joshua, change.org

"As a kid, I used to think iPhone, and iOS as a whole, was great. As I thought "people don't need alot of things, they have everything they want." Until I had a Google Pixel 6 Pro for Christmas. It became my tinkering device, and allowed me to access things, I never knew I wanted. And it allowed me to have access things that usually would've costed my family a pretty penny. By forcing verification "

Josue, change.org

Όλες οι αναφορές, editorials, δημοσιογραφική κάλυψη και βίντεο →

Ενεργοποιήσου Ολόκληρη η λίστα υλικού, στοιχεία επικοινωνίας με νομοθέτες, σύνδεσμοι για κάθε χώρα, και πως να αντισταθείς → Ανοιχτή Επιστολή Διάβασε την ανοιχτή επιστολή που έχει υπογραφεί απο οργανισμούς ενάντια στην ταυτοποιήση προγραμματιστών →

Εσύ αγόρασες το κινητό σου.
Εσύ πρέπει να αποφασίσεις τι τρέχει σε αυτό.

Αυτό δεν θα έπρεπε να χρειάζεται μια διαδικασία 9 βημάτων, μια εικοσιτετράωρη αναμονή, και την συνεχόμενη άδεια της Google.

Μοιράσου αυτήν την σελίδα. Μην κάνεις εγγραφή. Μην τους επιτρέψεις να κλειδώσουν το Android.